41The sons of Micah were Pithon, Melech, Tahrea and Ahaz. 42Ahaz became the father of Jarah, and Jarah became the father of Alemeth, Azmaveth and Zimri; and Zimri became the father of Moza, 43and Moza became the father of Binea and Rephaiah his son, Eleasah his son, Azel his son. 44Azel had six sons whose names are these: Azrikam, Bocheru and Ishmael and Sheariah and Obadiah and Hanan. These were the sons of Azel.
New American Standard Bible (©1995)
The sons of Micah were Pithon, Melech, Tahrea and Ahaz.GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
Micah's sons were Pithon, Melech, and Tarea. King James Bible
And the sons of Micah were, Pithon, and Melech, and Tahrea, and Ahaz. Douay-Rheims Bible
And the sons of Micha, were Phithon, and Melech, and Tharaa, and Ahaz. Darby Bible Translation
And the sons of Micah: Pithon, and Melech, and Tahrea. English Revised Version
And the sons of Micah; Pithon, and Melech, and Tahrea, and Ahaz. Webster's Bible Translation
And the sons of Micah were, Pithon, and Melech, and Tahrea, and Ahaz. World English Bible
The sons of Micah: Pithon, and Melech, and Tahrea, [and Ahaz]. Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Micah: Pithon, and Melech, and Tahrea,
1 Chronicles 8:35 The sons of Micah were Pithon, Melech, Tarea and Ahaz.
1 Chronicles 9:40 The son of Jonathan was Merib-baal; and Merib-baal became the father of Micah.
1 Chronicles 9:42 Ahaz became the father of Jarah, and Jarah became the father of Alemeth, Azmaveth and Zimri; and Zimri became the father of Moza,
Matthew Henry's Whole Bible Commentary Verses 35-44 These verses are the very same with ch. 8:29-38, giving an account of the ancestors of Saul and the posterity of Jonathan. There it is the conclusion of the genealogy of Benjamin; here it is an introduction to the story of Saul. We take the repetition as we find it; but if we admit that there are in the originals, especially in these books, some errors of the transcribers, I should be tempted to think this repetition arose from a blunder. Some one, in copying out these genealogies, having written those words, v. 34 (These dwelt in Jerusalem), cast his eye on the same words, ch. 8:28 (These dwelt in Jerusalem), and so went on with what followed there, instead of going on with what followed here; and, when he perceived his mistake, was loth to make a blot in his book, and so let it stand. We have a rule in our law, Redundans non nocet-Redundancies do no harm.
1 Chronicles 9 Commentaries: Barnes • Clarke • Darby • Gill • Geneva • Guzik • JFB • Keil / Delitzsch • KJV Translators' • Henry's Concise • Matthew Henry • Scofield • TSK • WesleyNIV / NLT / ESV / GWT / KJV / ASV / DRB Jump to Previous Occurrence
Ahaz Melech Micah Pithon Jump to Next Occurrence
Ahaz Melech Micah Pithon New American Standard Bible Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation, La Habra, Calif. All rights reserved. For Permission to Quote Information visit http://www.lockman.org. GOD'S WORD® is a copyrighted work of God's Word to the Nations. Quotations are used by permission. Copyright 1995 by God's Word to the Nations. All rights reserved. Alphabetical: Ahaz and Melech Micah of Pithon sons Tahrea The were Bible Browser | |
The King.
We have now to turn and see the sudden change of fortune which lifted the exile to a throne. The heavy cloud which had brooded so long over the doomed king broke in lightning crash on the disastrous field of Gilboa. Where is there a sadder and more solemn story of the fate of a soul which makes shipwreck "of faith and of a good conscience," than that awful page which tells how, godless, wretched, mad with despair and measureless pride, he flung himself on his bloody sword, and died a suicide's death, …
Alexander Maclaren—The Life of DavidChronicles
The comparative indifference with which Chronicles is regarded in modern times by all but professional scholars seems to have been shared by the ancient Jewish church. Though written by the same hand as wrote Ezra-Nehemiah, and forming, together with these books, a continuous history of Judah, it is placed after them in the Hebrew Bible, of which it forms the concluding book; and this no doubt points to the fact that it attained canonical distinction later than they. Nor is this unnatural. The book …
John Edgar McFadyen—Introduction to the Old Testament |
